I have spent the past several years trying to articulate the differences of the term logic, tool, and aesthetic. A good friend and colleague has been struggling to understand what I mean by these terms and their boundaries or definitions.
Go here for a some more info on them.
I have tried using movies as a way to define them and explain their functions. Somewhat successful in conversation, but I think food might be a better way to do so.
Take pierogi. They, as written on Wikipedia, “are dumplings of unleavened dough – first boiled, then they are baked or fried usually in butter with onions – traditionally stuffed with potato filling, sauerkraut, ground meat, cheese, or fruit.”
Does this sound like any other foods?
How about a wonton? From Wikipedia- “Wontons are made by spreading a square wrapper (a dough skin made of flour, egg, water, and salt)[1][2] flat in the palm of one’s hand, placing a small amount of filling in the center, and sealing the wonton into the desired shape ” Again a dough outer layer with stuffing. Wontons are usually filled with ground pork and are “commonly boiled and served in soup or sometimes deep-fried.”
Take the Maultasche, or mouth bag, from southern Germany. On Wikipedia it is defined as “It consists of an outer-layer of pasta dough which encloses a filling traditionally consisting of minced meat, smoked meat, spinach, bread crumbs and onions and flavoured with various herbs and spices”
Italian cuisine gives us ravioli(not to mention the tortelloni and tortellini!). Ravioli “are composed of a filling sealed between two layers of thin egg pasta dough“. From Jewish cuisine, we have the kreplach and from Russian cuisine, the pelmeni. The dough of the kreplach “is traditionally made of flour, water and eggs“, while the pelmeni has less egg, if any. There is also the Belarusian kalduny, the Ukranian varenyky, the empanada from the Spanish/Portuguese speaking world, the Romanian/Turkish/Armenian manti, the Mongolian buuz, the Korean mandu (this page has a list of the varieties of mandu), the Tibetan momo, the Uzbekian chuchvara, the Georgian khinkali, which is eaten in an interesting manner, the Circassian mataz, the Indian samosa, the Chinese baozi and the baozi page has a list of all the different types of baozi, which brings me to another point which I will address later. This listing of types of carbohydrate food bags is by no means exhaustive. There are many that I have missed.
The cooking method and stuffing aside, these dishes are a flour based wrapper filled with other food materials. They are more similar to each other than not. Given the range of food in the world, I would say that they are essentially the same thing.
How do the carbohydrate food bags apply to the logic/tool/aesthetic triangle?
The logic of these foods, and food in general for that matter, is nutrition. Food provides energy and material to build or repair cells. More specifically, we could say that the logic of these types of foods is carbohydrate food bags. The tool is the ingredients that make up each kind of carbohydrate food bag. The aesthetic is how those ingredients are prepared. Wontons, for example, are sealed “into the desired shape.”
In terms of savory or sweet as an aesthetic, maultaschen tend to be savory, while kreplachs are sometimes filled with sweet cheese. Other aesthetic variations are fried or boiled carbohydrate food bags. Aesthetic variations also exist in the thickness of the doughs used to create the food bags and in the size. Maultaschen, generally 8-12 cm across, tend to be the largest. There is a version of the baozi, the ‘Dabao (“big bun”),’ which “measuring about 10 cm across, served individually, and usually purchased for take-away” is larger than the xiaobao version, which measure only 5 cm across.
Shape is also a means for aesthetic expression in the world of carbohyrate food bags. Samosas tend to be somewhat pyramidical. Khinkali look like small hot water bags. Ravioli tend to somewhat rectangular; tortellini somewhat curved. Momo are circular and similar to the khinkali but without the long top. Please see the photos below for a few visual examples.
Going back to the baozi. We could refine our definition of logic and say that the logic we want to deal with now is the baozi. The tools are the ingredients that make up the baozi – a steamed bun (carbohydrate) made with yeast filled with meat or vegetables. The aesthetic choices can be sweet or savory. There is the Charsiu bau, which is filled” with barbecue-flavoured char siu pork.” The Kaya-baozi is “filled with Kaya, a popular jam made from coconut, eggs, and sometimes pandanin Malaysia and Singapore.” The Korean mandu also has several variations. The “Saengchi mandu (생치만두),” is “stuffed with pheasant meat, beef, and tofu” and “was eaten in Korean royal court and in the Seoul area during winter.” There is the Mulmandu (물만두). “The word itself means “water mandu” since it is boiled.”
Logic, with relation to carbohydrate food bags, could be defined as fried and savory. This logic would be satisfied by fried meat filled pierogi, gunmandu, and geröstete maultaschen. We could say that we want a logic of roundness within the carbohydrate food bag world. Maultaschen would not satisfy that logic, neither would pierogi, unless you looked down the long axis. Momo satisfy the round logic when viewed from above.
The above examples for logic might seem somewhat murky. But I gave these examples to show tools,aesthetics, and logics are not determined by what something is, but more by how it functions.
The simplest way I know how to define these three terms is as follows –
the logic is why
the tool is what
the aesthetic is how.